The price file only holds closing prices, so it can't say anything about upside by itself.

Highest 1-year upside (consensus target)

#TickerAnalysis dateClose then1Y targetUpside
1CRWVAug 1$71.77$138.01+92%
2INTUJun 22$254.87$437.00+71%
3IONQSep 21$40.51$68.62+69%
4PLTRJun 26$112.53$187.50+67%
5NOWJun 19$95.04$152.50+60%

ORCL is just behind at +60% (the rounded figure ties NOW's), then COHR at +54%.

Highest 5-year upside (5-year projection)

#TickerAnalysis dateClose then5Y targetUpside
1IONQSep 21$40.51$117.50+190%
2UBERJul 26$68.91$175.00+154%
3CRWVAug 1$71.77$180.00+151%
4NFLXJul 17$68.95$170.00+147%
5QSSep 5$5.48$13.50+146%

INTU is just behind at +144%, then NOW at +134%.

CRWV, IONQ, INTU and NOW make the top seven on both lists. At the bottom, the reports' own targets sit below the analysis-date price for four stocks over 1 year: INTC (−26%), ZIM (−17%), SPG (−5%) and AMD (−1%). Over 5 years, INTC, ZIM and AAPL rank lowest, at about +10–15%.

Things to keep in mind:

  • Prices are old, not live. They are closes from the analysis dates (June–September 2026), not today, so some are over three months out of date. Real upside today could be quite different, especially for volatile names like CRWV, IONQ and QS.
  • The targets are pulled from the reports' text. They are AI-written estimates, not analyst data I checked. The 5-year number is whatever figure the report headlines, which may be a base case rather than a bull case.
  • Some stocks have only one source. MCD, LEN, LULU, NBIS and VCLT were covered by Gemini alone. SPCX is in the price file but has no deep dive with targets, so it's left out.
  • High upside usually comes with high risk. The top of both lists is mostly speculative or high-beta stocks such as quantum computing, AI infrastructure and solid-state batteries.

This ranks what the reports themselves project; it isn't investment advice, and I'm not a licensed advisor.